top of page

The COO who was running the company without the authority to fix it

  • Jul 9
  • 2 min read

An empty boardroom about to host a meeting with a CEO and their board. The COO is running the organization without the authority to fix it.
An empty boardroom about to host a meeting with a CEO and their board. The COO is running the organization without the authority to fix it.

A COO at a mid-size organization has been the operational centre of the business for six years. The CEO, a founder, carries a standing with the board based on a strong shared history. But over the past eighteen months, the pattern has shifted. Decisions that used to take days now take weeks. Strategic conversations stall. The founder is present in title but increasingly absent in practice. The CEO's standing with the board has made this deterioration difficult to confront directly.


The COO has filled the gap. Quietly, then habitually, then permanently. Direct reports now route most decisions through the COO. Key clients have noticed who is actually running the business. The board has noticed too, though they have said nothing formal about it.

Three months ago, a search firm made contact. The COO declined to engage. There were commitments in progress, a team that depended on continuity, and a genuine belief that the situation would resolve itself.


It has not resolved itself.


The COO had stayed because leaving mid-course felt like abandonment. There is a particular kind of exhaustion that comes from carrying responsibility without authority, from being the person everyone depends on inside a structure that has never formally acknowledged that dependence. It does not arrive all at once. It accumulates.

A second approach has now arrived, this time from an organization where the COO role carries full operational authority and a clear reporting line to a functioning board. The compensation is stronger. The mandate is explicit.


The COO is not sure the current situation is fixable without a structural intervention the board has shown no appetite for. Staying means continuing to carry authority that was never formally granted. Leaving means the organization loses the person who has been holding it together, and the COO knows it.


Neither path feels clean.


If this situation is familiar, The Defining Move examines the professional choices that shape careers at the C-suite level. Published on the first Tuesday of most months.

If you are ready to work through a decision of your own, the Suitability Check will confirm whether your circumstances are ready for a formal Decision Facilitation session. Or book directly.

THE EXECUTIVE DECISION | CHRISTINE BOOTH

 

 

The Executive Decision is a guided methodology for structural decision analysis. This service is not a substitute for legal, financial, operational, business, or therapeutic advice. While Christine Booth facilitates the analytical process, she does not provide business directives or make decisions for you. You remain the sole decision-maker with full authority and responsibility for your choices.

Based in Burlington, Ontario | Serving Clients Globally

©2026 All rights reserved [ PRIVACY POLICY ]

bottom of page